Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 19:23:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB4C923113B7E7C9A8EAB8755D84525F74FCCBFC97F47B1A25A95A6E4914F534
Participant Details

Original Note:

El abogado de Aldama NO fué el juez que inhabilitó a Baltasar Garzón. https://x.com/brujula_legal/status/1860314201954128181?t=rt4o6h62M7gYRHWDBvSb_Q&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860756379151016123
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB4C923113B7E7C9A8EAB8755D84525F74FCCBFC97F47B1A25A95A6E4914F534
  • createdAtMillis - 1732476227223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1860756379151016123DB4C923113B7E7C9A8EAB8755D84525F74FCCBFC97F47B1A25A95A6E4914F534