Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 19:18:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6688347A003C6C04A507BB4121BC632236625B4DC6C869202F2D9F515E03398
Participant Details

Original Note:

In there context of meta studies, only those studies that are included are counted as "examined". The paper linked in the post actually included only 338 studies. "Of 56,603 reviewed citations, 338 studies reported in 518 publications met inclusion criteria." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264410X21003856

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860755783887024359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6688347A003C6C04A507BB4121BC632236625B4DC6C869202F2D9F515E03398
  • createdAtMillis - 1732475939156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1860755783887024359C6688347A003C6C04A507BB4121BC632236625B4DC6C869202F2D9F515E03398