Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 12:06:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46267E6800FF22B5F83F48F54128671A580A88F5267617D072A7C1F28F6A548B
Participant Details

Original Note:

À l’opposé de ce qu’affirme Mme Panot, une simple lecture de la proposition de loi démontre qu’elle ne rétablit pas l’état du droit antérieur de la loi du 29 juillet 1881, l’alinéa 6 de l’article 24, abrogé en 2014¹, n’étant pas réintroduit². ¹ : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/article_jo/JORFARTI000029754420 ; https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/LEGITEXT000006070722 ² : https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/l17b0577_proposition-loi#

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860653970001166769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46267E6800FF22B5F83F48F54128671A580A88F5267617D072A7C1F28F6A548B
  • createdAtMillis - 1732450018188
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186065397000116676946267E6800FF22B5F83F48F54128671A580A88F5267617D072A7C1F28F6A548B