Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 15:07:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9C48D376BAC4AF003402D97B319903AEC9E7AEE421B06A861D55CAC792543C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qu’affirme l’exposé des motifs de cette proposition de loi, ses dispositions n’opèrent pas un retour au droit antérieur, puisque la disposition abrogée en 2014¹ n’est pas réintroduite². ¹ : https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/article_jo/JORFARTI000029754420 ² : https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/l17b0577_proposition-loi#

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1860646984660418948
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F9C48D376BAC4AF003402D97B319903AEC9E7AEE421B06A861D55CAC792543C2
createdAtMillis - 1732460821848
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1860646984660418948F9C48D376BAC4AF003402D97B319903AEC9E7AEE421B06A861D55CAC792543C2