Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 10:03:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C5ABEE10D920702B9B65F378EC19CD1E9AE7FD8D0AC2675A1F1DCA3D31D071D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is misleading. Whilst both activities have been graded carcinogenic, the risk is significantly different and this is not shown anywhere in the post. https://amp.theguardian.com/science/sifting-the-evidence/2015/oct/26/meat-and-tobacco-the-difference-between-risk-and-strength-of-evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860619065695273280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C5ABEE10D920702B9B65F378EC19CD1E9AE7FD8D0AC2675A1F1DCA3D31D071D
  • createdAtMillis - 1732529015512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18606190656952732807C5ABEE10D920702B9B65F378EC19CD1E9AE7FD8D0AC2675A1F1DCA3D31D071D