Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 00:58:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54D8EB152AAB242112A4DB0DE540DB32375E6CAD53B4CD425D8311C7FC641512
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is misleading. Whilst both activities have been graded carcinogenic, the risk is significantly different and this is not shown anywhere in the post. https://amp.theguardian.com/science/sifting-the-evidence/2015/oct/26/meat-and-tobacco-the-difference-between-risk-and-strength-of-evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860619065695273280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54D8EB152AAB242112A4DB0DE540DB32375E6CAD53B4CD425D8311C7FC641512
  • createdAtMillis - 1732496292029
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186061906569527328054D8EB152AAB242112A4DB0DE540DB32375E6CAD53B4CD425D8311C7FC641512