Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 13:46:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B69DCA68C4A6443573FE483DE616CAD3AE925722C713A1065756EB39C65E719
Participant Details

Original Note:

La proposition ne vise pas à supprimer le délit mais à lutter contre de manière plus efficace et honnête, comme avant 2014. En l’état, il permet de ficher S des manifestants et opposants sans raison, de bâillonner comme l’expliquent plusieurs juges. Cf article du même journal. https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2024/04/30/comprendre-les-zones-de-flou-autour-du-delit-d-apologie-du-terrorisme_6229866_4355771.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860615747359089144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B69DCA68C4A6443573FE483DE616CAD3AE925722C713A1065756EB39C65E719
  • createdAtMillis - 1732456004399
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18606157473590891449B69DCA68C4A6443573FE483DE616CAD3AE925722C713A1065756EB39C65E719