Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 15:57:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E0D7D0CEED306A8E90453D37450B2B178365F9927D4D560FFC1B41C4B3A57E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The accuracy of scientific information contained in Wikipedia is roughly the same as that of the E. Britannica. https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/24943-wikipedia-matches-encyclopaedia-britannica-for-science-finds-peer-review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860595011953279166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E0D7D0CEED306A8E90453D37450B2B178365F9927D4D560FFC1B41C4B3A57E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1732463830767
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18605950119532791660E0D7D0CEED306A8E90453D37450B2B178365F9927D4D560FFC1B41C4B3A57E9