Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 04:27:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BC27F443E9F1ECF7F32D8C2EF84D791A8188B2E96EC6DCCF3638AF8908D863A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet doesn't say anything about number of votes, which is a suspiciously specific metric to brandish in contradiction. If all she ever does is "show up & vote", then the OG tweet is still factual and unchallenged. If someone has evidence of MTG "doing the reading"...

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860400592302022853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BC27F443E9F1ECF7F32D8C2EF84D791A8188B2E96EC6DCCF3638AF8908D863A
  • createdAtMillis - 1732422471568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18604005923020228536BC27F443E9F1ECF7F32D8C2EF84D791A8188B2E96EC6DCCF3638AF8908D863A