Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 06:37:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37A7A1218FBB0E9D36CA3581C47A0A469292EBD04A4A8ED10AB9E2E77117121C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet doesn't say anything about number of votes, which is a suspiciously specific metric to brandish in contradiction. If all she ever does is "show up & vote", then the OG tweet is still factual and unchallenged. If someone has evidence of MTG "doing the reading"...

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860400592302022853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37A7A1218FBB0E9D36CA3581C47A0A469292EBD04A4A8ED10AB9E2E77117121C
  • createdAtMillis - 1733899072467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186040059230202285337A7A1218FBB0E9D36CA3581C47A0A469292EBD04A4A8ED10AB9E2E77117121C