Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 02:03:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15E1FF3D03FF5ABECCDE12461AFA72A54E94162BF38C7DB80043F2A26CDAF83F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The tweet doesn't say anything about number of votes, which is a suspiciously specific metric to brandish in contradiction. If all she ever does is "show up & vote", then the OG tweet is still factual and unchallenged. If someone has evidence of MTG "doing the reading"...

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860400592302022853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15E1FF3D03FF5ABECCDE12461AFA72A54E94162BF38C7DB80043F2A26CDAF83F
  • createdAtMillis - 1732413795357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186040059230202285315E1FF3D03FF5ABECCDE12461AFA72A54E94162BF38C7DB80043F2A26CDAF83F