Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 18:11:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7974ACFB010550E944210837DD53CF704D2E9AD6EA14027A4B1A5EA266BE5F69
Participant Details

Original Note:

公選法第136条-2を論拠にノートに情報が記述されておりますが兵庫県選挙管理委員会は既に回答を出している点に留意。 https://www.j-cast.com/2024/11/15498056.html?p=all よってこのノート群の投票は慎重にお願いします。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860382480790061367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7974ACFB010550E944210837DD53CF704D2E9AD6EA14027A4B1A5EA266BE5F69
  • createdAtMillis - 1732385489499
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18603824807900613677974ACFB010550E944210837DD53CF704D2E9AD6EA14027A4B1A5EA266BE5F69