Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 15:52:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E707F24CB1C2C39979F49E0298786261A8471F9E7B5A4B3E2EF93BC70A0CE41F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst scrutiny of Rachel Reeves' CV includes skepticism of her academic qualifications eg https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/rachel-reeves-savaged-over-implausible-cv-as-resume-poses-questions/ar-AA1uvmwx the main criticisms are around her claim to have been a Bank of England economist - a claim she appears to have dropped https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Reeves Given that, wider skepticism about her CV is not surprising

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860322102655783065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E707F24CB1C2C39979F49E0298786261A8471F9E7B5A4B3E2EF93BC70A0CE41F
  • createdAtMillis - 1732377151035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1860322102655783065E707F24CB1C2C39979F49E0298786261A8471F9E7B5A4B3E2EF93BC70A0CE41F