Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 22:33:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57ED7B935B954F779D00FBC657385DBB1DCCD48CDF3C0301C6B27FBC864D60F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst scrutiny of Rachel Reeves' CV includes skepticism of her academic qualifications eg https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/rachel-reeves-savaged-over-implausible-cv-as-resume-poses-questions/ar-AA1uvmwx the main criticisms are around her claim to have been a Bank of England economist - a claim she appears to have dropped https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Reeves Given that, wider skepticism about her CV is not surprising

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860322102655783065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57ED7B935B954F779D00FBC657385DBB1DCCD48CDF3C0301C6B27FBC864D60F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1732401225857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186032210265578306557ED7B935B954F779D00FBC657385DBB1DCCD48CDF3C0301C6B27FBC864D60F7