Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 09:20:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22C2BF9F99D96090EF482B3F154221B5E016493FE148C21032786FA8251873E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Choclán no pudo inhabilitar a Baltasar Garzón porque él era uno de los abogados a los Garzón ordenó escuchar ilegamente las comunicaciones con sus clientes. Hechos estos por los que se inhabilitó a Garzón. Sentencia: https://laadministracionaldia.inap.es/noticia.asp?id=1056576

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860080647655530599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22C2BF9F99D96090EF482B3F154221B5E016493FE148C21032786FA8251873E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1732353608377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186008064765553059922C2BF9F99D96090EF482B3F154221B5E016493FE148C21032786FA8251873E8