Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 14:51:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD20663511D2F361E61D05CB1788B6A4659FCD643D111A274D5CFCE175757B38
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note IS needed, because the majority of the replies are misunderstanding this to mean Majors’ conviction was overturned. Majors’ conviction in a criminal court remains. This was a civil lawsuit over comments Majors made after the conviction. https://variety.com/2024/film/news/jonathan-majors-grace-jabbari-lawsuit-dropped-1236217515/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859944597411013008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD20663511D2F361E61D05CB1788B6A4659FCD643D111A274D5CFCE175757B38
  • createdAtMillis - 1732287065206
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859944597411013008BD20663511D2F361E61D05CB1788B6A4659FCD643D111A274D5CFCE175757B38