Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 08:35:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A385444E1F5FE3EA5D536EF140C53591A39899D4197DC455D949C8606054D7FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Irreführend: Hätte Habeck widersprochen, so hätte die Staatsanwaltschaft das Verfahren einstellen müssen und es wäre nicht zur Hausdurchsuchung gekommen. https://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/194.html#:~:text=4Die%20Taten%20nach%20den%20S%C3%A4tzen%202%20und%203%20k%C3%B6nnen%20jedoch%20nicht%20von%20Amts%20wegen%20verfolgt%20werden%2C%20wenn%20der%20Verletzte%20widerspricht

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859875744203039031
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A385444E1F5FE3EA5D536EF140C53591A39899D4197DC455D949C8606054D7FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1732264502824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859875744203039031A385444E1F5FE3EA5D536EF140C53591A39899D4197DC455D949C8606054D7FA