Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-25 16:18:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0B5EE24FC8046DEE772382B6E4659672E9B449F9F926CB370244EDBF7D82D75
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant (and a strawman). The original post does not claim that no such study exists, but that none was used by FDA because the shot is not licensed for pregnant women.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859859838827647182
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0B5EE24FC8046DEE772382B6E4659672E9B449F9F926CB370244EDBF7D82D75
  • createdAtMillis - 1732551500094
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859859838827647182E0B5EE24FC8046DEE772382B6E4659672E9B449F9F926CB370244EDBF7D82D75