Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 06:08:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2E80CB1CBF172F08F0A4FA10997345A9AC78BB83A6C4D1ED9E134B6FA7A866E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant (and a strawman). The original post does not claim that no such study exists, but that none was used by FDA because the shot is not licensed for pregnant women.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859859838827647182
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2E80CB1CBF172F08F0A4FA10997345A9AC78BB83A6C4D1ED9E134B6FA7A866E
  • createdAtMillis - 1732342104345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859859838827647182C2E80CB1CBF172F08F0A4FA10997345A9AC78BB83A6C4D1ED9E134B6FA7A866E