Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 08:26:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 731AFED8E7D6114342726E3B1FF4D1C9E206B0AAF84A045EFA32C92498D4F4C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant (and a strawman). The original post does not claim that no such study exists, but that none was used by FDA because the shot is not licensed for pregnant women.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859859838827647182
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 731AFED8E7D6114342726E3B1FF4D1C9E206B0AAF84A045EFA32C92498D4F4C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1732350382202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859859838827647182731AFED8E7D6114342726E3B1FF4D1C9E206B0AAF84A045EFA32C92498D4F4C4