Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 13:44:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F528F391FEBE5CF3AC3CAA7C28BCBB5DD23B35B84DC68CC1E3592F17FE84A7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant (and a strawman). The original post does not claim that no such study exists, but that none was used by FDA because the shot is not licensed for pregnant women.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859859838827647182
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F528F391FEBE5CF3AC3CAA7C28BCBB5DD23B35B84DC68CC1E3592F17FE84A7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1732283073256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18598598388276471824F528F391FEBE5CF3AC3CAA7C28BCBB5DD23B35B84DC68CC1E3592F17FE84A7E