Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-24 00:33:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1902252FF09D7D7D67D9B337E1C8350612055EF64EDE0B890DBB1F5F7224D05D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant (and a strawman). The original post does not claim that no such study exists, but that none was used by FDA because the shot is not licensed for pregnant women.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859859838827647182
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1902252FF09D7D7D67D9B337E1C8350612055EF64EDE0B890DBB1F5F7224D05D
  • createdAtMillis - 1732408434661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18598598388276471821902252FF09D7D7D67D9B337E1C8350612055EF64EDE0B890DBB1F5F7224D05D