Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 14:26:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E4DE001A04891F12A770A6A1E4582D2164CD39A747E69DB407493A206652D72
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn - So the first CN which cited clear X rules is being opinionated, and you, who are saying that the ICC is operating according to personal agenda because you didn’t like a decision they made, are not? Please mind the purpose of CNs before using it to vent anger. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859856165762367669
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E4DE001A04891F12A770A6A1E4582D2164CD39A747E69DB407493A206652D72
  • createdAtMillis - 1732285618433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18598561657623676694E4DE001A04891F12A770A6A1E4582D2164CD39A747E69DB407493A206652D72