Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 06:53:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C077AD9A34660F6B036C1E54709BD99241D312A58E67B900D7B8207EB35C4E03
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICC has clarified the question of jurisdiction stating ‘Article 19(2) prohibits states from contesting the Court's jurisdiction before an arrest warrant is issued.’ This meant Israel’s challenge was premature. There is no antisemitism here just international jurisprudence. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-state-palestine-icc-pre-trial-chamber-i-rejects-state-israels-challenges

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859850550428262458
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C077AD9A34660F6B036C1E54709BD99241D312A58E67B900D7B8207EB35C4E03
  • createdAtMillis - 1732344833527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859850550428262458C077AD9A34660F6B036C1E54709BD99241D312A58E67B900D7B8207EB35C4E03