Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 07:11:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 590CDE7CE2BEB9C4A0BCBBAE0977112A13BF09733DD3D65C756A9D2E7894E736
Participant Details

Original Note:

The New York Times does not use the Oxford comma. https://archive.nytimes.com/afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/23/faqs-on-style-2/ However, even with an Oxford comma, the headline would still be misleading. They could've just reworded it - the comma doesn't make much of a difference.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859849357949837478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 590CDE7CE2BEB9C4A0BCBBAE0977112A13BF09733DD3D65C756A9D2E7894E736
  • createdAtMillis - 1732259466278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1859849357949837478590CDE7CE2BEB9C4A0BCBBAE0977112A13BF09733DD3D65C756A9D2E7894E736