Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 00:04:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E8EC51B567E3B72D35780FD6B1D1BEC019310AB30DDF62C5E26CDC1816F2C77
Participant Details

Original Note:

元の記事において、「品質や安全性に問題がある「重大な相違」の事例はなかったという。」と書かれていることに留意が必要です。 https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/ad3538e950bd2d4b88e3956b18bc28080c8fabd8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859740494865281244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E8EC51B567E3B72D35780FD6B1D1BEC019310AB30DDF62C5E26CDC1816F2C77
  • createdAtMillis - 1732233885970
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18597404948652812447E8EC51B567E3B72D35780FD6B1D1BEC019310AB30DDF62C5E26CDC1816F2C77