Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 02:01:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84834CEFF0CD415B16543684FCF3E9CC30A5AC20E35324C03AC64809FF109465
Participant Details

Original Note:

Las personas que solo ven el titular o incluso leen la nota deben tener precaución porque ya una experta en estadística ha dado cuenta de la falta de fiabilidad en varias encuestas publicadas por medios de comunicación https://www.youtube.com/@hanwenzhang1982

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859721270696284355
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84834CEFF0CD415B16543684FCF3E9CC30A5AC20E35324C03AC64809FF109465
  • createdAtMillis - 1732240877749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 185972127069628435584834CEFF0CD415B16543684FCF3E9CC30A5AC20E35324C03AC64809FF109465