Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 19:06:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D31905BC3A2333298DC30B7AA06D305045E4FF512159D690C5C84F510E49E4A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Les sondages avec un échantillon de 1000 personnes sont considérés comme étant d’un bon rapport précision/taille. https://www.lesphinx-developpement.fr/blog/taille-echantillon-necessaire-pour-resultats-significatifs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859663533954203953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D31905BC3A2333298DC30B7AA06D305045E4FF512159D690C5C84F510E49E4A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1732215965651
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859663533954203953D31905BC3A2333298DC30B7AA06D305045E4FF512159D690C5C84F510E49E4A0