Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 08:41:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E626BA53A9FBB138A3F3A816D827DC3DE089405CD19CC63E0CDD942BDB53F14
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Les sondages avec un échantillon de 1000 personnes sont considérés comme étant d’un bon rapport précision/taille. https://www.lesphinx-developpement.fr/blog/taille-echantillon-necessaire-pour-resultats-significatifs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859663533954203953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E626BA53A9FBB138A3F3A816D827DC3DE089405CD19CC63E0CDD942BDB53F14
  • createdAtMillis - 1732264891728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18596635339542039538E626BA53A9FBB138A3F3A816D827DC3DE089405CD19CC63E0CDD942BDB53F14