Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 20:15:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21E9364251B0FED5AB05781075B649C625635F551DFBDF4A714D5E4DA5A66E7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Les sondages avec un échantillon de 1000 personnes sont considérés comme étant d’un bon rapport précision/taille. https://www.lesphinx-developpement.fr/blog/taille-echantillon-necessaire-pour-resultats-significatifs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859663533954203953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21E9364251B0FED5AB05781075B649C625635F551DFBDF4A714D5E4DA5A66E7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1732220147576
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185966353395420395321E9364251B0FED5AB05781075B649C625635F551DFBDF4A714D5E4DA5A66E7D