Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-22 06:20:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47521B31B63A8909B8C3D7D2E41A2053CBDBE5AB162794455B370D47977E01C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es ging dabei nicht um "Werbung für einen Einkaufschip" sondern um den Missbrauch des Ministeramtes. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Briefbogenaffäre

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859557434127188003
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47521B31B63A8909B8C3D7D2E41A2053CBDBE5AB162794455B370D47977E01C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1732256413510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 185955743412718800347521B31B63A8909B8C3D7D2E41A2053CBDBE5AB162794455B370D47977E01C8