Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 11:08:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 989E7636C637E27F45A0E3BCCCBFF0D12B75881CBBC1EDB91009230DE3FDEDD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The logo that the new replaced was a different one of the old logo presented, the new logo brings to bring part of older pepsi logos back https://www.printmag.com/branding-identity-design/the-new-pepsi-logo-proves-the-mass-appeal-of-nostalgic-rebrands/ https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/28/business/pepsi-new-logo/index.html https://www.technologyformarketing.co.uk/news/case-study-pepsis-new-logo-3-lessons-rebranding

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859497374835453966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 989E7636C637E27F45A0E3BCCCBFF0D12B75881CBBC1EDB91009230DE3FDEDD6
  • createdAtMillis - 1732187337546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1859497374835453966989E7636C637E27F45A0E3BCCCBFF0D12B75881CBBC1EDB91009230DE3FDEDD6