Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 21:38:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DA6AA73643DED54761923CB65B15E29054AD86303D147570596780B8344DD8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The logo that the new replaced was a different one of the old logo presented, the new logo brings to bring part of older pepsi logos back https://www.printmag.com/branding-identity-design/the-new-pepsi-logo-proves-the-mass-appeal-of-nostalgic-rebrands/ https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/28/business/pepsi-new-logo/index.html https://www.technologyformarketing.co.uk/news/case-study-pepsis-new-logo-3-lessons-rebranding

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1859497374835453966
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8DA6AA73643DED54761923CB65B15E29054AD86303D147570596780B8344DD8A
createdAtMillis - 1732225125476
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18594973748354539668DA6AA73643DED54761923CB65B15E29054AD86303D147570596780B8344DD8A