Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 08:16:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E90182210B2CFDFFFA6128FF7258B0F6EEA84B9EDEE6499AFD244558843A3619
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AMA has no policy or advocacy positions on uterus transplantation, nor has it proposed taxpayer funding of such procedures. The journal article (published in June 2023) presented ethical arguments for a hypothetical health issue. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-fact-check-recent-articles-about-uterus-transplants

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1859350899304378729
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E90182210B2CFDFFFA6128FF7258B0F6EEA84B9EDEE6499AFD244558843A3619
createdAtMillis - 1732177003910
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1859350899304378729E90182210B2CFDFFFA6128FF7258B0F6EEA84B9EDEE6499AFD244558843A3619