Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 02:36:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2A6553A0CD4EDBE33E8A432F5DC45146CFF8357FB628CD90755C55CFCE6E078
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AMA has no policy or advocacy positions on uterus transplantation, nor has it proposed taxpayer funding of such procedures. The journal article (published in June 2023) presented ethical arguments for a hypothetical health issue. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-fact-check-recent-articles-about-uterus-transplants

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1859350899304378729
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D2A6553A0CD4EDBE33E8A432F5DC45146CFF8357FB628CD90755C55CFCE6E078
createdAtMillis - 1732156609811
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1859350899304378729D2A6553A0CD4EDBE33E8A432F5DC45146CFF8357FB628CD90755C55CFCE6E078