Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 02:36:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65EADF5770D728EE7366D2E315AB0730C7C4E30D46BB2EE9E67A1C35958BD231
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AMA has no policy or advocacy positions on uterus transplantation, nor has it proposed taxpayer funding of such procedures. The journal article (published in June 2023) presented ethical arguments for a hypothetical health issue. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-fact-check-recent-articles-about-uterus-transplants

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1859350899304378729
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 65EADF5770D728EE7366D2E315AB0730C7C4E30D46BB2EE9E67A1C35958BD231
createdAtMillis - 1732156595050
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 185935089930437872965EADF5770D728EE7366D2E315AB0730C7C4E30D46BB2EE9E67A1C35958BD231