Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 00:55:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3271419A65639FEF4243DB4142D50D8BAF394AD16CD19DAF796C1322CA8C69AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AMA has no policy or advocacy positions on uterus transplantation, nor has it proposed taxpayer funding of such procedures. The journal article (published in June 2023) presented ethical arguments for a hypothetical health issue. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-fact-check-recent-articles-about-uterus-transplants

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1859350899304378729
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3271419A65639FEF4243DB4142D50D8BAF394AD16CD19DAF796C1322CA8C69AA
createdAtMillis - 1732150550937
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18593508993043787293271419A65639FEF4243DB4142D50D8BAF394AD16CD19DAF796C1322CA8C69AA