Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 09:50:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 136C34279AEFCFA6F1271DB201D709E6B72297A48D65EF90FD4613D83C24C2B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AMA has no policy or advocacy positions on uterus transplantation, nor has it proposed taxpayer funding of such procedures. The journal article (published in June 2023) presented ethical arguments for a hypothetical health issue. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-fact-check-recent-articles-about-uterus-transplants

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1859350899304378729
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 136C34279AEFCFA6F1271DB201D709E6B72297A48D65EF90FD4613D83C24C2B8
createdAtMillis - 1732182649514
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1859350899304378729136C34279AEFCFA6F1271DB201D709E6B72297A48D65EF90FD4613D83C24C2B8