Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 18:05:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36C4E755B5E103273FEA391BAF41C5CD3EC8726086D63FCACE6D56546AA8CA5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Klarstellung: Der BGH hat festgestellt: Es ging nicht um „Kinderschutz“, sondern um bewusste Rechtsbeugung. Geltendes Recht vorsätzlich zu missachten, ist ein Angriff auf den Rechtsstaat. https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2024/2024222.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859291700902216136
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36C4E755B5E103273FEA391BAF41C5CD3EC8726086D63FCACE6D56546AA8CA5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1732125943777
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185929170090221613636C4E755B5E103273FEA391BAF41C5CD3EC8726086D63FCACE6D56546AA8CA5A