Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-21 01:47:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55131AD554BA94FD2D2940F1811AA818B6F58AA499F90C7AF6E829405A1B02F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota não é necessária nesse post, uma vez que o post não é enganoso ou necessita de contexto adicional, na matéria apresentada se trata sobre influencers e não de grupos mídiaticos, além de em nenhum momento a Folha de São Paulo negar receber tal recurso na matéria vinculada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859272938773418087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55131AD554BA94FD2D2940F1811AA818B6F58AA499F90C7AF6E829405A1B02F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1732153673488
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185927293877341808755131AD554BA94FD2D2940F1811AA818B6F58AA499F90C7AF6E829405A1B02F5