Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 17:09:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42772640081559278E42E21B7269B702F2174EA475044B93B9EADC1426DAA277
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota não é necessária nesse post, uma vez que o post não é enganoso ou necessita de contexto adicional, na matéria apresentada se trata sobre influencers e não de grupos mídiaticos, além de em nenhum momento a Folha de São Paulo negar receber tal recurso na matéria vinculada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859272938773418087
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42772640081559278E42E21B7269B702F2174EA475044B93B9EADC1426DAA277
  • createdAtMillis - 1732122561243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185927293877341808742772640081559278E42E21B7269B702F2174EA475044B93B9EADC1426DAA277