Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 21:22:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF44A718E368F5EDC68D39454A4FE88EF948D5E7F88AFDDE01AA9E53678208A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note cites conservation commitments but provides no source. Also has typos. The cited source seems to back up OPs comments that the Commissioners disagree with Elon's views and modus operandi. There may be context to add, but this isn't it. This is just an opinion. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/10/california-reject-musk-spacex-00183371

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859263212291510765
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF44A718E368F5EDC68D39454A4FE88EF948D5E7F88AFDDE01AA9E53678208A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1732137761387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859263212291510765FF44A718E368F5EDC68D39454A4FE88EF948D5E7F88AFDDE01AA9E53678208A3