Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 16:05:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97F25FC71621E27C6C4F43075C029F58EA188C6CA1CD8698F2F13A7E890FAE28
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note cites conservation commitments but provides no source. Also has typos. The cited source seems to back up OPs comments that the Commissioners disagree with Elon's views and modus operandi. There may be context to add, but this isn't it. This is just an opinion. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/10/california-reject-musk-spacex-00183371

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859263212291510765
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97F25FC71621E27C6C4F43075C029F58EA188C6CA1CD8698F2F13A7E890FAE28
  • createdAtMillis - 1732118705780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185926321229151076597F25FC71621E27C6C4F43075C029F58EA188C6CA1CD8698F2F13A7E890FAE28