Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 12:15:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B73E47EE06154A0B23FDB07C6FDC461D171428DD0CC498ECD04CD08A54D71F1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

A 2014 Supreme Court case, NLRB v. Noel Canning, greatly affected the use of recess appointments. There has been zero recess appointments since this ruling. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._Noel_Canning https://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/court-strikes-down-recess-appointments-in-plain-english/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859091464766021844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B73E47EE06154A0B23FDB07C6FDC461D171428DD0CC498ECD04CD08A54D71F1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1732104945051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1859091464766021844B73E47EE06154A0B23FDB07C6FDC461D171428DD0CC498ECD04CD08A54D71F1C