Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 12:05:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 900D70FA2CD6DBB828E7B0030AF688E728612B4790D3B82FAB629F6BA7CF1F52
Participant Details

Original Note:

3月の通報内容に事実が含まれているかの確認をすることは現在も百条委員会で審査中です。現在進行形なので否定はされていません。だから兵庫県の事例も未確定なものとして記述されているのです。無問題です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859041995001655677
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 900D70FA2CD6DBB828E7B0030AF688E728612B4790D3B82FAB629F6BA7CF1F52
  • createdAtMillis - 1732104319836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1859041995001655677900D70FA2CD6DBB828E7B0030AF688E728612B4790D3B82FAB629F6BA7CF1F52