Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 03:35:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59351C14131DCD284447F9C7EF2915211B6C6F33C0023FAD6F77B1DCE94F3C36
Participant Details

Original Note:

3月の通報内容に事実が含まれているかの確認をすることは現在も百条委員会で審査中です。現在進行形なので否定はされていません。だから兵庫県の事例も未確定なものとして記述されているのです。無問題です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859041995001655677
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59351C14131DCD284447F9C7EF2915211B6C6F33C0023FAD6F77B1DCE94F3C36
  • createdAtMillis - 1732073749209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185904199500165567759351C14131DCD284447F9C7EF2915211B6C6F33C0023FAD6F77B1DCE94F3C36