Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-26 10:36:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A61B1CB2261FAC61C567929CBED94F08AAF1BFDD11DA5972F2E7F7F2F760274
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper was retracted because the methodology is flawed. The journal that has now published it, can only be seen as a fake journal, its editorial board is filled with well-known anti-vaxxers, including an author of the paper (McCullough). https://science.feedback.org/review/flawed-preprint-autopsies-inadequate-demonstrate-covid19-vaccines-caused-74-percent-deaths/ https://www.respectfulinsolence.com/2023/11/06/study-laundering-retracted-antivax-studies-resurrected-in-fake-journals/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858829996694933831
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A61B1CB2261FAC61C567929CBED94F08AAF1BFDD11DA5972F2E7F7F2F760274
  • createdAtMillis - 1732617398473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18588299966949338314A61B1CB2261FAC61C567929CBED94F08AAF1BFDD11DA5972F2E7F7F2F760274