Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-11-20 06:11:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
Participant Details
Original Note:
The paper was retracted because the methodology is flawed. The journal that has now published it, can only be seen as a fake journal, its editorial board is filled with well-known anti-vaxxers, including an author of the paper (McCullough). https://science.feedback.org/review/flawed-preprint-autopsies-inadequate-demonstrate-covid19-vaccines-caused-74-percent-deaths/ https://www.respectfulinsolence.com/2023/11/06/study-laundering-retracted-antivax-studies-resurrected-in-fake-journals/
All Note Details