Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 00:11:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 411AF97A97884881C4933DB8E37257759EE3B565DFA7E42EC6D87A750ECD82E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is factually incorrect with both claims. The mechanism is well researched and has been explained in terms of use and manufacture. It's a well known artifact that lots of people have talked and written about and does not debunk our entire historical perspective. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84310-w

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858781600630083706
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 411AF97A97884881C4933DB8E37257759EE3B565DFA7E42EC6D87A750ECD82E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1732061490909
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858781600630083706411AF97A97884881C4933DB8E37257759EE3B565DFA7E42EC6D87A750ECD82E0