Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 00:37:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87777DA6FEAE0E9954D3816F01183199E11C2F24A7C6405B7BA1D8F7B8EEAE28
Participant Details

Original Note:

「明確に知事からパワハラを受けたと言う人はいなかったが、自分ではパワハラにあたるか判断ができないと言う人もいたので、聞いた事実がパワハラにあたるか評価したい。」 という回答の一部を切り取ったものです。 https://youtu.be/eD34d53DAPU?si=C-rJKR94pfNd5526&t=397

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858765146019229740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87777DA6FEAE0E9954D3816F01183199E11C2F24A7C6405B7BA1D8F7B8EEAE28
  • createdAtMillis - 1732063052798
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185876514601922974087777DA6FEAE0E9954D3816F01183199E11C2F24A7C6405B7BA1D8F7B8EEAE28